During discussion taking place in PinDead's disciplinary appeal, several extremely important pieces of information were presented, largely disproving A.D.'s initial claims of grooming. A.D. outright falsified large pieces of information, such as the age gap between them and Pin. Screenshots relating to this below:
Order of images goes: the information A.D. provided staff in relation to the image —> direct image from Pin and A.D.'s DMs
Addressing A.D.'s claims about age difference
Addressing A.D.'s claims about informing Pin of reluctance
Further, more potentially explicit images in relation to A.D.'s omitting of important information can be found in both the full appeal and in the staff chat discussion of the appeal. Please backread to be fully informed on the situation before discussing potential disciplinary action.
SUMMARY OF EVENT INDICATING NEED FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION:
The overall apparent situation, as presented in the appeal and screenshots/video provided, is that A.D. brought forward altered information to get PinDead banned as the user began to grow distant romantically from A.D. A.D. skewed information and lied to staff in order to get PinDead banned, following a similar line of behavior that was previously seen in smaller scenarios, such as A.D.'s staff application. Further, A.D. was shown to have exhibited behavioral patterns seen as "stalker-like" by harassing Pin for explicit pictures across platforms (specifically, as described in the appeal, Roblox and Snapchat when Pin was unreachable on Discord).
Please use the following format in the responses to this:
**Preferred Disciplinary Action:** Ban (duration), Kick, Mute, etc.
**Reasoning:**
**Additional Notes:**i've got that friday night fever, sometimes a man just needs a breather